I turned on the television this morning and just in time to hear a British scientist being interviewed on MSNBC. The commentator asked this scientist, “How did you discover this ‘God particle?’” The materialist’s answer was, “Well, the ‘God particle’ is basically theoretical.”
So I decided to look into this “God particle,” and here is a short article I found.
Is “God Particle” the right term for massive mystery in physics?
Posted by: Tom Heneghan
One of the most brilliant simplifications I’ve ever come across is the term “the God Particle.” Physicists think this subatomic speck of matter, if it is ever found, could explain the mysterious code at the origin of the physical world. To know this would be to “know the mind of God,” as Einstein wanted to do. The Nobel Prize winning physicist Leon Lederman wrote a book with that name 15 years ago that was so interesting that even a physics klutz like myself (I almost failed it in high school…) read and enjoyed it.
It turns out, though, that the physicist who launched the hunt for this elusive particle doesn’t like its nickname. “It embarrasses me,” Peter Higgs said in Geneva this week at a news conference our correspondent Robert Evans attended. “Although I am not a believer myself, it’s a misuse of terminology that might offend some people.”
At least Mr. Higgs is concerned with offending those who do believe in God, which is very unusual.
The story here is (as usual) that the “God particle,” among many other “unfalsifiable” theories (the string theory, evolution, the Big Bang), are nothing more than naturalistic fairy tales. And these fairy tales are put forth in our public school classrooms and universities, by material scientists, as fact!
You can read the full article here:
Tags: atheism, Darwinism, God, god particle, material science